by nippur10 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:54 am
I didn't mean to confuse anyone; and, I did not necessarily mean a waste repository for nuclear material. Certainly, a Nuclear Generating facility, as well as a waste storage area, doesn't, in any way, resemble a pyramid (at least as we know it). This repository was to store something, unspent and unused (ready-to-use), that was so dangerous that it took millions of tons of rock to cover it in case that day would and might come. I still favor a matter/anti-matter pod. Again, sorry for the confusion. Also, the "valley temple" may be associated with the Khafre pyramid. The "processional causeway" does show some erosion, but the "oserion-like" structure does not. Now, the "Sphinx temple" shows a lot of erosion from both water and wind. If the "Sphinx temple" is associated with the Khufu pyramid (we know that it is associated with the Sphinx because the building blocks came from the Sphinx pit) then the "Valley temple", because of its erosion patterns, may be of a much later construction than the "Sphinx temple" and thus the Khafre pyramid of a much later construction date than the Khufu pyramid and may account for the differences in internal construction design and purpose. Would welcome your ideas!