nephilim evidence

[Cammi2012]

I was googling "nephilim evidence" and tons of crazy pics came up of giant skeletons and such. have any of these ever been tested? what is the conclusions of these findings?

EDITED TO ADD: it's a shame this board isnt more active. there are a lot of really smart people on here and subjects that are fascinating.

[Moon]

The best evidence for the existence of extraterrestrials that could be deemed Nephilim or Annunaki is the very strangely shaped skulls that have been found all over the world. With the technology available to extract ancient DNA many of those skulls hopefully will be tested.

Zecharia Sitchin has found what he believes to be a direct descendant of the Annunaki (extraterrestrials) whose remains are in a museum. Here is the latest according to his website:

Goddess of Ur Genome Project

Dear Sitchin Friends & Fans,

Thank you for all your kind messages, we are sorry we could not respond to the numerous messages. I know you are all interested in our progress to test Nin.Puabi's bones which was the last wish and hope of Zecharia. As you are probably aware, before Zecharia died, he established "The Goddess of Ur Genome Project" to achieve this goal. Its work has been diligent and has thus far achieved the following:

1. The museum has been very cooperative and will in all likelihood allow the bones to be tested when a qualified person or institution comes forward to do that and satisfies the balance of the museum's protocol requirements which are all reasonable. This is presently being worked on.
2. Those of you who have been sending emails -- we thank you -- but at this point all emails to the museum should cease as the bombardment of further emails demanding the DNA testing of Nin.Puabi by Sitchin fans will only work against us. We will let you know if pressure is needed but it is best now to hold your energy in reserve.

Please continue to monitor this website for future updates.

December 2010

Also his website for those interested:

http://www.sitchin.com/

The Starchild Skull while only 900 years old is another one that is in the process of having more tests done to verify it.

http://www.lloydpye.com/

I hope these answers help you out.

[Talen143]

I know that some of those Google images are photo shopped fakes. (Unfortunately) it’s a shame that it’s so hard to tell real from fake these days with all the technology we have. I think that there was another thread about giants and this website was linked. I spent a little time looking at it, but not extensive.

Here is the link if you haven't seen it yet.

http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/index2.html

I hope they do the testing on those skeletons at the museum.. I look forward to hearing the results to that as well as the starchild skull.

[Hearte]

I know that some of those Google images are photo shopped fakes.

Most come from the photoshop contest put on by this website:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030710000140/http://www.worth1000.com/cache/contest/contestcache.asp?contest_id=447&display=photoshop

Look through these photos. You'll recognize many of them.

Hearte

[Ace Rimmer]

I know that some of those Google images are photo shopped fakes. (Unfortunately) it’s a shame that it’s so hard to tell real from fake these days with all the technology we have. I think that there was another thread about giants and this website was linked. I spent a little time looking at it, but not extensive.

Here is the link if you haven't seen it yet.

http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/index2.html

I hope they do the testing on those skeletons at the museum.. I look forward to hearing the results to that as well as the starchild skull.

I really like Steve Qualye's site.

[Hearte]

Sorry, that was a very old link.

Looks like the pics won't load anymore - probably took them down, after 11 years!

Hearte

[Inquiring Mind]

Yes, the hard physical evidence in the form of elongated skulls (some having horns!) and giant skeletal bodies found all over the world that have been wonderfully compiled and archived by people like Steve Quayle, Ed Conrad, Michael Cremo and Lloyd pye is simply amazing. It's no accident that in many of the ancient written accounts as well as in various pictorial depictions and or artifacts, these same beings (the Nephilim/Awwim/Watchers/Anunnaki etc..) are portrayed as having the same features as the remains that have been found. I think it's fair to say that we have all been lied too massively about the true history of this planet.

[Hearte]

I think it's fair to say that we have all been lied too massively about the true history of this planet.

It is also fair to say that most, if not all, of the photos of giant skeletons were either lifted from the photoshop contest I linked or created by the "authors" themselves.

Hearte

[ilacewords]

I think it's fair to say that we have all been lied too massively about the true history of this planet.

It is also fair to say that most, if not all, of the photos of giant skeletons were either lifted from the photoshop contest I linked or created by the "authors" themselves.

Hearte

No way to tell since none of the pictures that you linked will load.

[Inquiring Mind]

I think it's fair to say that we have all been lied too massively about the true history of this planet.

It is also fair to say that most, if not all, of the photos of giant skeletons were either lifted from the photoshop contest I linked or created by the "authors" themselves.

Hearte

I have no doubt that there are some fakes out there, however to dismiss out of hand all that has been found as you've done, is simply foolish. These inconvenient discoveries (detrimental to the 'official' story) are incredibly compelling when coupled with the plethora of universal ancient accounts that speak in detail of these 'serpent gods' who seeded mankind and mated with human women to create a hybrid race, these Nephilim giants, according to the accurate descriptions found in the aforementioned accounts match the mass of remains that have been found perfectly-elongated skulls and all. Just a coincidence? I don't think so. Steve Quayle's archive of anomalous skeletal remains, in particular, is quite impressive and well documented, each entry is meticously sourced with the details of it's discovery. I suggest you do a bit of homework before jumping to rash, ill-informed conclusions.

The 'Demi-god/god-king' (hybrid) Ramses the 2nd. An Egyptian pharoah many global elites trace their bloodlines back to.



Ubaid/Sumerian Reptilian statues. Note the elongated shape of the heads



More Ubaid/Sumerian Reptilian statues. Again, notice the shape of the head?



Ancient South American elongated head and Lloyd Pye's 'Starchild' skull:

[thesaint]

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

[AnuAtlantian]

Best video ive seen that has real skull and bones of giant Anunnaki least 8 feet tall with best pics of skull elongated staight back strong jaw and two plates instead of three like ours. A real different being found near puma punku. Giants did and I believe still roam the earth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhMhkEisqKQ

[ilacewords]

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

He was posting photos of skulls that don't fit the norm and Hearte didn't post any photos that would load as evidence. There are of course photoshopped pictures out there but making such a broad generalization as you and Hearte are doing is not an informed answer. You should review Steve Quayles website who doesn't deal with contests but actual facts.

[Inquiring Mind]

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

Wow. Haha. The sheer disingenuous, intellectual laziness on display in the above post is quite simply laughable. No initiative is even being put forth to objectively investigate any of this on one's own accord. Pathological skeptics always seem to want things spoon-fed to them. People often wonder why the world is in the state it is in today, I can frankly say that in part-it is because of small minded attitudes held by padlocked minds like 'thesaint'. As I stated before, in lieu of saving time and post space, Steve Quayle's archive/catalog is vastly extensive, heavily sourced and meticously detailed on every entry regarding anomalous giant skeletal remains. I've noticed a few naysayers in this thread have repeatedly made excuses and or farcical assertions that they couldn't access Quayle's site-baloney! I had no problem whatsoever finding the link or perusing his site, in fact here's the link...there is enough hard, valid physical evidence amassed here to keep anyone occupied for days. It's time to wake up and smell the coffee, we are not alone, we never have been. The official version of history is a fairy tale:

There were giants [Nephilim/Watchers] in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown

-Genesis 6:4

http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/index2.html

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"-Albert Einstein

So true!!

[Hearte]

Wow. Haha. The sheer disingenuous, intellectual laziness on display in the above post is quite simply laughable. No initiative is even being put forth to objectively investigate any of this on one's own accord. Pathological skeptics always seem to want things spoon-fed to them.

What's entirely laughable is your assumptuion that simply because one disagrees, that person must not have put in the necessary research.

One thing I'm certain of, had I not linked the photoshop contest, you would never have known that such photos were faked and taken by nefarious sorts (like Quayle) to bilk money from the ignorant.

Hearte

[ilacewords]

Wow. Haha. The sheer disingenuous, intellectual laziness on display in the above post is quite simply laughable. No initiative is even being put forth to objectively investigate any of this on one's own accord. Pathological skeptics always seem to want things spoon-fed to them.

What's entirely laughable is your assumptuion that simply because one disagrees, that person must not have put in the necessary research.

One thing I'm certain of, had I not linked the photoshop contest, you would never have known that such photos were faked and taken by nefarious sorts (like Quayle) to bilk money from the ignorant.

Hearte

Hearte, you're a mind reader as well???
Thanks I needed a good laugh today.

And no way could they have researched it with Mr. Quayle's website linked above. Just as you could not have either because you refuse to click on any link that's given to you. Mr. Quayle has done more than extensive research with more than enough documentation of where the evidence comes from. It's been scruntenized by plenty with bigger agendas than your own, Hearte, and yet it still stands.

[thesaint]

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

Wow. Haha. The sheer disingenuous, intellectual laziness on display in the above post is quite simply laughable. No initiative is even being put forth to objectively investigate any of this on one's own accord. Pathological skeptics always seem to want things spoon-fed to them. People often wonder why the world is in the state it is in today, I can frankly say that in part-it is because of small minded attitudes held by padlocked minds like 'thesaint'. As I stated before, in lieu of saving time and post space, Steve Quayle's archive/catalog is vastly extensive, heavily sourced and meticously detailed on every entry regarding anomalous giant skeletal remains. I've noticed a few naysayers in this thread have repeatedly made excuses and or farcical assertions that they couldn't access Quayle's site-baloney! I had no problem whatsoever finding the link or perusing his site, in fact here's the link...there is enough hard, valid physical evidence amassed here to keep anyone occupied for days. It's time to wake up and smell the coffee, we are not alone, we never have been. The official version of history is a fairy tale:

There were giants [Nephilim/Watchers] in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown

-Genesis 6:4

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"-Albert Einstein

So true!!

What are you talking about? disingenuous? the pictures you posted are of abnormal skulls no where in my previous post did I say the picture you posted were fake or photoshop or that these skulls were fabricated. What I was talking about and I believe hearte was talking about are these pictures that you find online if you search for giant skeleton. They all came from the photoshop contest he spoke about. I don't need a listen from you on the physical evidence because I have done my research that is why I knew what hearte was talking about. You were talking about one thing we were talking about something else no need to start name calling. These are just a few from the many photoshop photos that are on the web. Can you provide me with link to scientific journals or archeological finds (besides the giant femur)that show giant remains that are 20 to 50 feet long? Again no where in my post did I say all abnormal skulls on the the internet are fake I did say that the pics of giant remains are fake.

it is because of small minded attitudes held by padlocked minds like 'thesaint

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

He was posting photos of skulls that don't fit the norm and Hearte didn't post any photos that would load as evidence. There are of course photoshopped pictures out there but making such a broad generalization as you and Hearte are doing is not an informed answer. You should review Steve Quayles website who doesn't deal with contests but actual facts.

I think Hearte was referring to giant remains not abnormal skulls atleast that was what I was referring to.

[ilacewords]

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

Wow. Haha. The sheer disingenuous, intellectual laziness on display in the above post is quite simply laughable. No initiative is even being put forth to objectively investigate any of this on one's own accord. Pathological skeptics always seem to want things spoon-fed to them. People often wonder why the world is in the state it is in today, I can frankly say that in part-it is because of small minded attitudes held by padlocked minds like 'thesaint'. As I stated before, in lieu of saving time and post space, Steve Quayle's archive/catalog is vastly extensive, heavily sourced and meticously detailed on every entry regarding anomalous giant skeletal remains. I've noticed a few naysayers in this thread have repeatedly made excuses and or farcical assertions that they couldn't access Quayle's site-baloney! I had no problem whatsoever finding the link or perusing his site, in fact here's the link...there is enough hard, valid physical evidence amassed here to keep anyone occupied for days. It's time to wake up and smell the coffee, we are not alone, we never have been. The official version of history is a fairy tale:

There were giants [Nephilim/Watchers] in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown

-Genesis 6:4

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance"-Albert Einstein

So true!!

What are you talking about? disingenuous? the pictures you posted are of abnormal skulls no where in my previous post did I say the picture you posted were fake or photoshop or that these skulls were fabricated. What I was talking about and I believe hearte was talking about are these pictures that you find online if you search for giant skeleton. They all came from the photoshop contest he spoke about. I don't need a listen from you on the physical evidence because I have done my research that is why I knew what hearte was talking about. You were talking about one thing we were talking about something else no need to start name calling. These are just a few from the many photoshop photos that are on the web. Can you provide me with link to scientific journals or archeological finds (besides the giant femur)that show giant remains that are 20 to 50 feet long? Again no where in my post did I say all abnormal skulls on the the internet are fake I did say that the pics of giant remains are fake.

it is because of small minded attitudes held by padlocked minds like 'thesaint

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

He was posting photos of skulls that don't fit the norm and Hearte didn't post any photos that would load as evidence. There are of course photoshopped pictures out there but making such a broad generalization as you and Hearte are doing is not an informed answer. You should review Steve Quayles website who doesn't deal with contests but actual facts.

I think Hearte was referring to giant remains not abnormal skulls atleast that was what I was referring to.

I believe the topic here is "nephilim evidence" which doesn't necessarily mean 'giants' - it would include skulls or evidence that doesn't go along with 'the norm'.

Hearte, which he so frequently likes to take topics off topic, decided to link a bunch of photoshopped pictures from a giant contest. Well, actually he linked what said it was pictures from a photoshop giant contest. Since none of the pictures would load, who knows what they really are.

Inquiring Mind then actually links a bunch of pictures for abnormal skulls which would fit the topic and that's when you said that they were faked as well in agreement with Hearte's nonexisting 'proof'.

Did you actually go and look at the links provided to thoroughly researched abnormal pictures of elongated and oddly shaped skulls before you made your statement of agreement with Hearte's? That's what he was replying to in my opinion.
The photo's above that he linked are most certainly not fakes and also included the Starchild Skull, which needs no faking.

[thesaint]

I believe the topic here is "nephilim evidence" which doesn't necessarily mean 'giants' - it would include skulls or evidence that doesn't go along with 'the norm'.

Hearte, which he so frequently likes to take topics off topic, decided to link a bunch of photoshopped pictures from a giant contest. Well, actually he linked what said it was pictures from a photoshop giant contest. Since none of the pictures would load, who knows what they really are.

Inquiring Mind then actually links a bunch of pictures for abnormal skulls which would fit the topic and that's when you said that they were faked as well in agreement with Hearte's nonexisting 'proof'.

Did you actually go and look at the links provided to thoroughly researched abnormal pictures of elongated and oddly shaped skulls before you made your statement of agreement with Hearte's? That's what he was replying to in my opinion.
The photo's above that he linked are most certainly not fakes and also included the Starchild Skull, which needs no faking.

Can you please show me where I said the photos of the elongated skulls are fake ?? I said the photos of giant remains on the internet. did you even read my post? elongated skulls vs giant remains in the pictures I posted are two different things. If you have info from a reputable scientific organization that has found giant remains (not the femur bone) like the ones I posted then please provide me with the information. if not then I stand by my original post that all the photos on the web of giant remains (not elongated skulls) giant remains are fakes.

[ilacewords]

I believe the topic here is "nephilim evidence" which doesn't necessarily mean 'giants' - it would include skulls or evidence that doesn't go along with 'the norm'.

Hearte, which he so frequently likes to take topics off topic, decided to link a bunch of photoshopped pictures from a giant contest. Well, actually he linked what said it was pictures from a photoshop giant contest. Since none of the pictures would load, who knows what they really are.

Inquiring Mind then actually links a bunch of pictures for abnormal skulls which would fit the topic and that's when you said that they were faked as well in agreement with Hearte's nonexisting 'proof'.

Did you actually go and look at the links provided to thoroughly researched abnormal pictures of elongated and oddly shaped skulls before you made your statement of agreement with Hearte's? That's what he was replying to in my opinion.
The photo's above that he linked are most certainly not fakes and also included the Starchild Skull, which needs no faking.

Can you please show me where I said the photos of the elongated skulls are fake ?? I said the photos of giant remains on the internet. did you even read my post? elongated skulls vs giant remains in the pictures I posted are two different things. If you have info from a reputable scientific organization that has found giant remains (not the femur bone) like the ones I posted then please provide me with the information. if not then I stand by my original post that all the photos on the web of giant remains (not elongated skulls) giant remains are fakes.

Your very first post here:

Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped.

Appeared right below said pictures of elongated skulls... We are talking about 'nephilim evidence' not giants is what I said.

[Hearte]

In fact, some of the pics did load.

The contest was from a decade ago. Some of the pics no doubt have been removed for spacesaving reasons.

My understanding of the site is that if you join (and it's free,) you can see all pics from previous contests.

I predict that many here won't join because they don't want to see such evidence - it would tend to deflate their unusual beliefs.

Yes, I was talking about the giants. Odd-shaped heads are the result of skull binding, of course. In the "starchild" skull, there is very little doubt that the individual suffered from some disease. I already stated (in that thread) what disease it could have been.

In the last century, hundreds of thousands of Japanese women had mis-shapen feet. Was this due to the cultural practice of foot binding, or were they related to some sort of tiny-footed aliens?

Hearte

[ilacewords]

In fact, some of the pics did load.

The contest was from a decade ago. Some of the pics no doubt have been removed for spacesaving reasons.

My understanding of the site is that if you join (and it's free,) you can see all pics from previous contests.

I predict that many here won't join because they don't want to see such evidence - it would tend to deflate their unusual beliefs.

I didn't see any but I'm not interested in photoshopping contests. I'll just keep visiting the sites that have real pictures to view. Thanks for the suggestion though.

Yes, I was talking about the giants. Odd-shaped heads are the result of skull binding, of course. In the "starchild" skull, there is very little doubt that the individual suffered from some disease. I already stated (in that thread) what disease it could have been.

In the last century, hundreds of thousands of Japanese women had mis-shapen feet. Was this due to the cultural practice of foot binding, or were they related to some sort of tiny-footed aliens?

Hearte

I'm sure everyone here would appreciate if you would stay on topic.
I won't again post evidence as to why your thoughts on the Starchild are wrong. I and many others have done so in no less than four seperate posts and you refused to view them. Seems your speaking from your own experience of hiding from reality. I'm not interested in your baiting tactics any longer.

[thesaint]

This is the last I am saying on this because this thread has gone off topic.

the original thread starter said

i was googling "nephilim evidence" and tons of crazy pics came up of giant skeletons and such. have any of these ever been tested? what is the conclusions of these findings?

then Talen143

I know that some of those Google images are photo shopped fakes. (Unfortunately) it’s a shame that it’s so hard to tell real from fake these days with all the technology we have.

then hearte said

Most come from the photoshop contest put on by this website:
http://web.archive.org/web/200307100001 ... =photoshop

Look through these photos. You'll recognize many of them.

Then I said "Non of the pictures u posted are of giant skull or giant remains. I agree with Hearte that the photo on the internet that show giant remains are photoshoped." I was refering to the giant images I posted which talen143, hearte and the op were talking about not elongated skulls. now back on topic

[Moon]

I have issued one warning for rudeness and condescending remarks and do not wish to issue another one. I and other staff here do not want to have to keep reminding people to maintain civil tones and treat each other with respect. If anyone has a problem with a thread or a member, please PM me or another moderator or administrator. We will gladly help out in any matter to keep the peace. This is the final notice, and anyone who is rude or uncivil will get issued a warning.

Lloyd

[Cammi2012]

So regarding the nephilim- if they were to open the queens chamber (or under the foot of the Sphinx) would they possibly find huge bones? what would they find? Is our government so wrapped up in it's religious beliefs that they would hide evidence that could possibly destroy the very foundation that their religion is made up on? (made up- ha ha ha, no pun intended..or was there? hhhmmmm)

[Moon]

So regarding the nephilim- if they were to open the queens chamber (or under the foot of the Sphinx) would they possibly find huge bones? what would they find? Is our government so wrapped up in it's religious beliefs that they would hide evidence that could possibly destroy the very foundation that their religion is made up on? (made up- ha ha ha, no pun intended..or was there? hhhmmmm)

In the book "Egyptian Dawn", Robert Temple suggests there are many tombs of the pharaohs hidden around the area of the Sphinx and Great Pyramid. Many of those places have not been dug up and it is quite possible there could be vast treasures and other artifacts there.

I doubt there would be any giants' remains there, but it would be great to find the tomb of Khufu and others. Then they would have to change the answer as to what the pyramids were used for.

[Cammi2012]

so now with hawass gone do you think any of that is going to change?

[Inquiring Mind]

What's entirely laughable is your assumptuion that simply because one disagrees, that person must not have put in the necessary research

Touche' good sir, touche'

One thing I'm certain of, had I not linked the photoshop contest, you would never have known that such photos were faked and taken by nefarious sorts (like Quayle) to bilk money from the ignorant.

Hearte

*sigh* I see that you're still making more excuses in an effort to dodge the valid points I've raised.

What are you talking about? disingenuous? the pictures you posted are of abnormal skulls no where in my previous post did I say the picture you posted were fake or photoshop or that these skulls were fabricated. What I was talking about and I believe hearte was talking about are these pictures that you find online if you search for giant skeleton. They all came from the photoshop contest he spoke about. I don't need a listen from you on the physical evidence because I have done my research that is why I knew what hearte was talking about. You were talking about one thing we were talking about something else no need to start name calling. These are just a few from the many photoshop photos that are on the web. Can you provide me with link to scientific journals or archeological finds (besides the giant femur)that show giant remains that are 20 to 50 feet long? Again no where in my post did I say all abnormal skulls on the the internet are fake I did say that the pics of giant remains are fake.

Nothing but more unfounded speculation on your part. All I see is more faulty logic coming from you i.e. 'since a few skeletal remains were faked, they must all be', what a bunch of irrational hogwash. You act as if mainstream archeology is some how a valid arbiter of what is or isn't possible. Your insinuation is a joke. They are largely a disingenuous lot, bent on obfuscating evidence and obscuring the truth (Hawass anyone?). I suggest you read Michael Cremo's books for some more insight on the monumental deceit on display in mainstream academic circles-there is a knowledge filter put into place by this edifice, the last thing they want to investigate are remains (like giant skeletons and elongated skulls) that shine a light on their dishonesty and expose their contrived chronology and Darwinistic framework for the fraud that it is. Any rational person would agree that Quayle's archive is more than credible.

As others have rightly pointed out as well, the elongated skulls found universally are relevant to the subject of the Nephilim as the 'gods' and their hybrids were often depicted and or written about in numerous accounts as having these physical features, thus I presented this information. Please inform yourself before jumping to rash assumptions.

*I apologize to the moderators if I sound rude or miffed at times. This isn't my intent. I am simply defending my position as civilly as possible.

[Hearte]

I suggest you read Michael Cremo's books for some more insight on the monumental deceit on display in mainstream academic circles

You realize, don't you, that Cremo is a Hindu Creationist?

Do you think perhaps he is biased toward the timelines provided by his religion? ("Forbidden Archaeology" was published by the Hari Krishnas.)

Might as well get your history lessons from Pat Robertson.

As others have rightly pointed out as well, the elongated skulls found universally are relevant to the subject of the Nephilim as the 'gods' and their hybrids were often depicted and or written about in numerous accounts as having these physical features, thus I presented this information. Please inform yourself before jumping to rash assumptions.

Please provide some evidence for the bolded portion above, if you can.

Hearte

[thesaint]

Nothing but more unfounded speculation on your part. All I see is more faulty logic coming from you i.e. 'since a few skeletal remains were faked, they must all be', what a bunch of irrational hogwash. You act as if mainstream archeology is some how a valid arbiter of what is or isn't possible. Your insinuation is a joke. They are largely a disingenuous lot, bent on obfuscating evidence and obscuring the truth (Hawass anyone?). I suggest you read Michael Cremo's books for some more insight on the monumental deceit on display in mainstream academic circles-there is a knowledge filter put into place by this edifice, the last thing they want to investigate are remains (like giant skeletons and elongated skulls) that shine a light on their dishonesty and expose their contrived chronology and Darwinistic framework for the fraud that it is. Any rational person would agree that Quayle's archive is more than credible.

As others have rightly pointed out as well, the elongated skulls found universally are relevant to the subject of the Nephilim as the 'gods' and their hybrids were often depicted and or written about in numerous accounts as having these physical features, thus I presented this information. Please inform yourself before jumping to rash assumptions.

*I apologize to the moderators if I sound rude or miffed at times. This isn't my intent. I am simply defending my position as civilly as possible.

Did you even read my post above or did you just come in here to shout. You keep telling me to research this and read that. If you had really done you research you would have known of the thread hearte spoke of. I have all of Micheal Cremo's books and many more dealing with AAT and I have done my research. AGAIN my post was not referring to elongated skulls or Nephilims.

Hearte was talking about pictures of giant skeleton remain being photoshoped not elongated skulls you then posted elongated skull pictures, I then said those picture are not of giant remains ( refering to the picture hearte , the other two posters and myself were refering to)

whats even funny is this quote from http://www.stevequayle.com

The original of this "giant photo" (top image) was borrowed from Cornell University: http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/outreach/mastodon/. The hoax began as part of a contest to fake photographs and apparently, many people continue to be taken in! — Stan Deyo

I'll ask you again If I am a closed minded padlock brain, non informed hogwash filled individual can you people who are calling me names search in google for giant skeleton (not elongated skulls or the large femur) click on images and find me a picture like the ones I posted that has not been photoshoped.

[ilacewords]

Did you even read my post above or did you just come in here to shout. You keep telling me to research this and read that. If you had really done you research you would have known of the thread hearte spoke of. I have all of Micheal Cremo's books and many more dealing with AAT and I have done my research. AGAIN my post was not referring to elongated skulls or Nephilims.

I'm beginning to think that no one is reading. The topic of this thread is nephilim evidence!!

If you want to have a topic on photoshop contests, please start a new thread in the general or entertainment section.
This is taking the thread way off topic and its only use is to be completely argumentative imo. Not constructive at all.

[thesaint]

Did you even read my post above or did you just come in here to shout. You keep telling me to research this and read that. If you had really done you research you would have known of the thread hearte spoke of. I have all of Micheal Cremo's books and many more dealing with AAT and I have done my research. AGAIN my post was not referring to elongated skulls or Nephilims.

I'm beginning to think that no one is reading. The topic of this thread is nephilim evidence!!

If you want to have a topic on photoshop contests, please start a new thread in the general or entertainment section.
This is taking the thread way off topic and its only use is to be completely argumentative imo. Not constructive at all.

that is why I asked those who are calling me names to post a link with picture of giant skeleton that have been verified to be authentic.
You and others seem to miss the first post in this thread.

I was googling "nephilim evidence" and tons of crazy pics came up of giant skeletons and such. have any of these ever been tested?

they were identified to be photoshoped.

[ilacewords]

that is why I asked those who are calling me names to post a link with picture of giant skeleton that have been verified to be authentic.
You and others seem to miss the first post in this thread.

Not so, it's been posted above no fewer than three times, but here it is again since you've missed it:
http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/index2.html

[thesaint]

that is why I asked those who are calling me names to post a link with picture of giant skeleton that have been verified to be authentic.
You and others seem to miss the first post in this thread.

Not so, it's been posted above no fewer than three times, but here it is again since you've missed it:
http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/index2.html

well thats not what I was talking about but whatever.

back to the elongated skulls
besides the start child skull have any of these elongated skulls been tested to see if the dna is abnormal or for genetic anomaly such as Dolichocephaly, Sotos syndrome/ Marfan syndrome ?
is it your belief that these disorders are genetic traits inherited from the nephilim?

[ilacewords]

that is why I asked those who are calling me names to post a link with picture of giant skeleton that have been verified to be authentic.
You and others seem to miss the first post in this thread.

Not so, it's been posted above no fewer than three times, but here it is again since you've missed it:
http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/index2.html

well thats not what I was talking about but whatever.

Sorry, maybe I should have been more specific, you have to actually click under the pictures tab on the left when the page loads. The address doesn't change so the link stays the same in the URL area of the browser, but clicking the tab on the left will take you to multiple pictures.