Zombi2012 wrote:How do we know that there was a "ice age"? I cant think of any way we could know. What evidence do we have? What methods or techniques do we use?
Im not saying that there wasnt one, i just want to know how we know.
Bob137 wrote:Part of why the Great Lakes is drying up, couldn't have anything to do with the Chinese owned water bottling plant sucking up the water, could it?
Polaris wrote:Bob137 wrote:Part of why the Great Lakes is drying up, couldn't have anything to do with the Chinese owned water bottling plant sucking up the water, could it?
WTF are you saying Bob137. Civilization slur!!... aren't we in this together?... on a scale of increasing intolerance (one to ten), please rate your current level of intolerance.
Are you perhaps, subconsciously, referring to American consumerism...
And more to the point, the science of geomorphology is used to study the ice ages. A geology degree usually precedes... Isostatic rebound is the principle that you refer to. A study of the drainage basins of the Great Lakes would help determine net in/out flows. The last time I looked Hudson Bay was still rising, as evidenced by the raised beaches.
The end of the giant animals of Ice Age North America was a catastrophic event, that after all said and done, wiped out the wooly mammoth, saber-tooth tiger, elk, beaver, deer, bear, etc... circa 13,955 BC. (In another post I have Noah's Tsunami at 9717 BC).
maxmercury wrote:Polaris wrote:Bob137 wrote:Part of why the Great Lakes is drying up, couldn't have anything to do with the Chinese owned water bottling plant sucking up the water, could it?
WTF are you saying Bob137. Civilization slur!!... aren't we in this together?... on a scale of increasing intolerance (one to ten), please rate your current level of intolerance.
Are you perhaps, subconsciously, referring to American consumerism...
And more to the point, the science of geomorphology is used to study the ice ages. A geology degree usually precedes... Isostatic rebound is the principle that you refer to. A study of the drainage basins of the Great Lakes would help determine net in/out flows. The last time I looked Hudson Bay was still rising, as evidenced by the raised beaches.
The end of the giant animals of Ice Age North America was a catastrophic event, that after all said and done, wiped out the wooly mammoth, saber-tooth tiger, elk, beaver, deer, bear, etc... circa 13,955 BC. (In another post I have Noah's Tsunami at 9717 BC).
Please maintain a civil tone here, Polaris. If you have a problem with someone's post, please notify a moderator or an administrator of it and we will deal with it. I did not find any major problem with what was stated by Bob137.
Bob137 wrote:Part of why the Great Lakes is drying up, couldn't have anything to do with the Chinese owned water bottling plant sucking up the water, could it?
Polaris wrote:I officially notify moderator Max, that Bob137 made a cultural slur against Chinese people. As he so delicately avoided my comment and in all likelihood hopes it will just going away...
I propose that Bob137 retracted his slur and apologize to the Chinese civilization for his bigot views and must vow never to perpetuate that attitude again.
Well said Max and Pons.Pons Asinorum wrote:Bob137 wrote:Part of why the Great Lakes is drying up, couldn't have anything to do with the Chinese owned water bottling plant sucking up the water, could it?Polaris wrote:I officially notify moderator Max, that Bob137 made a cultural slur against Chinese people. As he so delicately avoided my comment and in all likelihood hopes it will just going away...
I propose that Bob137 retracted his slur and apologize to the Chinese civilization for his bigot views and must vow never to perpetuate that attitude again.
Polaris, your assumptions are in error. Bob137's statement is not even remotely racist because:a) a statement about a foreign company bottling water has no racist context, in of itself.
b) any factor that takes water out of the Great Lakes is a legitimate subject for discussion when contemplating the replenishing rate of the Great Lakes.
c) Chinese company ≠ Chinese civilization; to make such a moral equivalence is a falsehood.
d) it is not racist just because the word “Chinese” is used.
You assumed facts not stated and then made a false accusation based on those assumption(s).
--
Polaris, you may want to consider rescinding your accusation that Bob137 has bigoted views (unwarranted and false) and that he made a slur against "Chinese civilization" (a falsehood). You may also want to consider rendering an apology to him for making such accusations. You may want to do this before the other moderators see your previous thread, as I suspect they will not be happy.
Your choice.

Sagittarii wrote:Some people are too darn sensitive. What's this world coming to?
Meow
Polaris wrote:Pons A. I am shocked by your use of the word racist. You were 'shouting' at me in previous posts "there is only one race on earth" - and not the five that I said there are - so I now use the term civilization...
Polaris wrote:I disagree with your dissection and analysis – I find it very myopic and in need of the larger context.
Polaris wrote:There is no Chinese water bottling company draining the water out of the Great Lakes - do you know of one?
Polaris wrote:Bob137 could have made his point without identifying one particular civilization. Yet he chose to identify the Chinese - why?
Sagittarii wrote:Meow
Jeff Sheet wrote:...oops, did I just impugn corporations?
Bob137 wrote:I hope that did not offend anyone, stating on the witness's, or Christians, but I am no Christian! Ignore me, if it helps, I will try not to upset anyone by my speculative nature.
Bob137 wrote:I don't have the time to look up the site again, on the siphoning of water for bottling water by a corporation, that is owned by an "Asian" country, which happens to be China! I was not putting the Chinese down, just stating who the corporation was owned by. If there is a problem with a certain business of a people and that they are Americans, and I say the Americans owned the corporation, would you take offense to that?
Bob137 wrote:When it comes to the Anunnaki, there is still more to be learned, such as with the ancient civilizations of India. I do not however completely agree with Sitchin, but I do believe he has some great documentation and books. I just have found Michael Cremo's books and others to be more accurate, so I prefer to go by there studies. I have my own studies of the past, and I refer to them also. Another person on this forum has a problem with me because I do not fully believe the book of Urantia, sorry guys,...
Bob137 wrote:but I am speculative of all kinds of things, and need further proof and further information for me to take everything at face value. I like all those books by those authors, and agree on many points, but I am still learning by reading more, and more, and have not just come to a conclusion based on just a few, or one. So many people have concluded from being told what the Bible says, that they believe completely on faith what their pastor, or minister, or priest, or whatever says. I am not like that, I question almost everything, not to say I am never wrong. I am wrong many times and I do admit it, sometimes not right away, but I do finally admit if I am incorrect. I like reading all your posts, and go to the url's that are put on here for all, and I agree with a lot, just not everything. If that seems to upset some, well I get upset to when people try to get me to come to their belief, just because they say so, reminds me of Jehovah witness's, I hope that did not offend anyone, stating on the witness's, or Christians, but I am no Christian! Ignore me, if it helps, I will try not to upset anyone by my speculative nature.
if we can't crack the code... "they are our fate" just like Flowers for Algernon
Sagittarii wrote:... If humans did have a golden age then doesn't that throw out the AAT?
If early humans were more advanced in a different way than we are now then maybe they didn't experience an intervention after all and all the megaliths were indeed made by more advanced humans that pre-date the great flood.
We decide which is right, and which is an illusion, Moody Blues
Fishing is overrated.Sagittarii wrote:I don't know what to believe anymore....i'm going nuts trying to figure it all out.
I'm just going to focus on my bass fishing and drinking this Summer. To hell with it all..lol.

Jeff Sheets wrote:...We could end up like bonobos or something, cause we chose war...
You know, it just occurred to me that Neandertals may have been the throwback from the previous Earth civilization, while homo-sapiens were just getting a foothold. No wonder their brain capacity was so large for basically nothing.
The cycle goes on and on.
-Jeff
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest