Polaris wrote:I looked at the seal and it is neither of Max's reference to a star nor a sun! In fact, with six points it sure looks like our sun to me. Science now describes our sun as a star.
As I see it, there are 12 objects in space around the sun, 11 (how many do you guys see?) in near orbit and 1 afar. Therefore, 12 + the sun = 13. The familiar themes begin from here...
And to answer a related query Max, the other large objects in the 'outer reaches' that are worthy of being called planets, they take such a long time to come back to perihelion that it is more of a nuisance for them to be placed into the orbital calendar. And they likely have very little gravitational effect on earth's, by virtue of them being so far out...
To refer to it as a Sun is a mistake on the part of anyone who translates it. The symbol for the Sun is a very unique one and they would of put in the wavy lines to make sure that is what they meant. One cannot claim that symbol shown in the tablet is the Sun.
The thing about the outer planets is they included a tiny object like Pluto and forgot about its companion, Charon. They would of mentioned something about the double planet if it was meant to be included. I can see omitting the other outer planets if they omitted Pluto, but they supposedly included it in that one tablet.
It really boils down to one tablet that shows the alleged nine planets if one interprets it that way. I have listed enough questions and evidence to put pause in that translation. Whether people want to interpret it as our solar system is up to them, but I do think they need to see all the evidence out there before making a decision on it.

