The Khafre Pyramid: Nuclear Repository

So how were the pyramids really built? Did the ancient Egyptians know electricity? Did they have lightbulbs? Knock yourself out trying to uncover the elusive answers...

Moderators: siren13, Essence, Giorgio Tsoukalos

The Khafre Pyramid: Nuclear Repository

Postby nippur10 » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:47 am

The story about the second pyramid being used as a burial place for Khafre is, for most serious researchers, in the realm of fantasy. Look, there's 6 million tons of limestone covering a space the size of a small cottage. The granite niche on the floor, at the center of this room, was meant to hold something small and it definitely is too small for a mummy. The architectural plan as well as the sheer weight of the structure and the size of the niche indicates something else: something small, but perhaps, dangerous. Here are some suggestions: 1. a cobalt/plasma bomb re-engineered to supply the energy needs of the Khufu pyramid. 2. a matter/anti-matter pod. 3. a container of element 115. I know I'm going out-on-a-limb here but it does make sense; and, I would appreciate your input.
nippur10
 

Postby Jeff Sheets » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:32 pm

Hi Nippur10,

I would be reluctant to call it a repository for nuclear material unless there was some evidence of radioactivity (more than just Radon) exhibited in the structure. What would the half life of any of these materials be? We also do not know the true age of the pyramid.

I like the theory of the Gizeh pyramid being a form of acoustic generator to move some kind of hydraulic energy.
Forge of Creation - http://www.aliengods.jbsheets.com

The art of life is to go confidently, without
rushing, without faltering. To meet and
master the four natural challenges:
Fear, Clarity of Thought, Power, and the
Desire to Rest.
User avatar
Jeff Sheets
Manna Machine Initiate
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Ramona, CA

Postby cesarnc » Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:13 am

Seems like WAAAYYY too much work to build a trash can :lol:
cesarnc
 
Top

slight modification...

Postby nippur10 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:54 am

I didn't mean to confuse anyone; and, I did not necessarily mean a waste repository for nuclear material. Certainly, a Nuclear Generating facility, as well as a waste storage area, doesn't, in any way, resemble a pyramid (at least as we know it). This repository was to store something, unspent and unused (ready-to-use), that was so dangerous that it took millions of tons of rock to cover it in case that day would and might come. I still favor a matter/anti-matter pod. Again, sorry for the confusion. Also, the "valley temple" may be associated with the Khafre pyramid. The "processional causeway" does show some erosion, but the "oserion-like" structure does not. Now, the "Sphinx temple" shows a lot of erosion from both water and wind. If the "Sphinx temple" is associated with the Khufu pyramid (we know that it is associated with the Sphinx because the building blocks came from the Sphinx pit) then the "Valley temple", because of its erosion patterns, may be of a much later construction than the "Sphinx temple" and thus the Khafre pyramid of a much later construction date than the Khufu pyramid and may account for the differences in internal construction design and purpose. Would welcome your ideas!
nippur10
 
Top


Return to Egypt and the Pyramids

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron